On the evening of 10 April 2026, a capsule called Integrity dropped into the Pacific Ocean about 50 miles off the coast of San Diego. Inside were four people who had just done something no human had done since December 1972 — travelled to the vicinity of the Moon and come back.
Victor Glover described re-entry as “riding a fireball through the atmosphere.” Reid Wiseman, the commander, radioed mission control just before re-entry: “We got a great view of the Moon out window 2 — looks a little smaller than yesterday.” Houston replied: “Guess you’ll have to go back.”
That exchange captures the whole thing rather well.
What Artemis II Actually Did
This was not a landing. The Artemis II crew — Wiseman, Glover, Christina Koch and Canadian astronaut Jeremy Hansen — flew around the far side of the Moon, reached a distance of 248,655 miles from Earth (breaking the record set by the Apollo 13 crew in 1970), and came home. The mission lasted ten days from launch on 1 April to splashdown on 10 April.
The primary purpose was to test the Orion spacecraft and the Space Launch System rocket in the deep space environment with actual humans aboard. Testing life support, manual controls, communications, navigation. Making sure all of it worked before anyone attempts a landing.
It worked. The spacecraft named Integrity held up. The heat shield — which had caused years of delays after unexpected chipping was discovered following Artemis I — performed through re-entry temperatures of around 3,000 degrees Fahrenheit. Mission managers were, in NASA’s own word, “pleased.”
There were moments that went beyond the technical. The crew flew through a total solar eclipse as the Moon blocked the Sun — something impossible to witness from Earth’s surface in that way. Glover described it as blowing them all away despite having seen the simulations. They photographed the Orientale Basin, a 600-mile crater on the lunar far side that had never been seen in direct sunlight before. They saw colours on the Moon — brown and green regions — that most people would not expect the Moon to have.
And then, during a press conference from space, Jeremy Hansen quietly announced that the crew had named a lunar crater “Carroll” — after Commander Wiseman’s wife, who died of cancer in 2020. Wiseman later called it the most profoundly moving moment of the mission. His crewmates proposed it while in medical quarantine before launch.
That is the kind of detail that does not usually make it into mission briefings.
Why Did It Take 54 Years
The last time humans were near the Moon was December 1972. Apollo 17 commander Gene Cernan stepped off the lunar surface knowing lean times were ahead — NASA had already cancelled Apollos 18, 19 and 20 to save money. He could not have known it would take more than half a century for anyone to follow.
The common assumption is that technology is the answer — that the gap reflects how hard spaceflight is. And it is hard. But historians and space policy researchers are consistent on this point: the US had the technological capability to return to the Moon for most of those 54 years. The real reasons were politics, money, and the lack of a compelling reason to go.
Apollo was a Cold War project. It consumed roughly 5% of the federal budget at its peak — a number that is genuinely difficult to comprehend in the context of modern government spending. The motivation was geopolitical: the Soviet Union had launched Sputnik in 1957, put Yuri Gagarin in orbit in 1961, and the United States needed to demonstrate to the world — particularly to newly independent nations navigating the space between superpowers — that it was the dominant force in civilisation. The Moon landing achieved that. Once it did, the rationale for continuing largely evaporated.
What followed was a 50-year pattern of presidential announcements followed by budget cuts and cancellations. George H.W. Bush announced a Moon and Mars program in 1989; it died in Congress. George W. Bush announced a return to the Moon in 2004; Barack Obama cancelled it in 2010. The Artemis program survived partly because it finally managed to maintain bipartisan support across multiple administrations — Trump gave it a name and a mandate, Biden kept it funded, and Trump returned to find it still on track.
There was also a blunter obstacle. As one researcher put it: “We stopped, and then we forgot.” Institutional knowledge dispersed. Engineers retired. The manufacturing processes for certain Apollo-era components no longer existed. The Orion spacecraft took two decades and more than $50 billion to develop. It is a more capable vehicle than anything that flew in the 1960s — flight computers 20,000 times faster, four times the habitable volume, an actual bathroom — but rebuilding that capability from a standing start after a 50-year gap is simply slower and more expensive than maintaining it would have been.
What Comes Next
Artemis III, planned for 2027, aims to land astronauts on the Moon’s south pole for the first time. The region is of particular interest because it contains permanently shadowed craters that are believed to hold water ice — a resource that could support longer missions and, eventually, a permanent human presence. Artemis IV would follow, with the goal of establishing more sustained operations.
There is also a geopolitical dimension that was largely absent from the Apollo era in this form. China has serious lunar ambitions and has stated a goal of putting taikonauts on the Moon before 2030. Whether this pressure translates into the kind of sustained political commitment that Apollo had remains an open question.
The honest answer about Artemis III and beyond is that none of it is guaranteed. Budget battles in Congress are ongoing. The Space Launch System rocket is expensive to operate — roughly $4 billion per launch — and there are legitimate questions about its long-term viability compared to commercial alternatives. The Orion heat shield issue required redesigning the re-entry approach for Artemis II, which added years and cost.
But Artemis II flew. Four people went to the Moon’s neighbourhood and came back. The spacecraft worked. For the first time in over half a century, that sentence is in the past tense rather than the conditional.
The Part That Actually Matters
Somewhere in the coverage of the Artemis II mission, there was video of a young boy at a watch party in San Diego cheering when Integrity splashed down. He was probably around the same age that the people who became NASA engineers in the 1990s were when they watched the Challenger disaster.
What Artemis II does for the generation currently growing up is harder to quantify than a distance record or a heat shield specification. Victor Glover became the first Black astronaut to travel to deep space. Christina Koch set a record for the farthest distance travelled by a woman. Jeremy Hansen was the first Canadian to leave Earth orbit. These are not merely symbolic — the research programs that will run on Artemis missions, and eventually on a lunar base, will need a great many people who are currently children.
Whether that translates into a sustained renewal of public interest in space exploration — or whether it follows the Apollo pattern of excitement followed by indifference — is genuinely unknowable. What is knowable is that the distance record now belongs to 2026, not 1970. And that a man named the Moon after his wife while travelling to it, and the people watching from the ground got a little bit of something they had not had in a while.
Guess they’ll have to go back.
These are personal observations and opinions. Almost Sunny is a personal blog.
If something here was worth your time, you can buy me a coffee — it genuinely helps keep this going. And if you’d like new posts straight to your inbox, no spam, no schedule pressure, subscribe here.
Almost Sunny 
Leave a comment